Reda Bennani vs Sergi Perez Contri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How effective are the players on second serves? Contri wins 41.2% of second serve points in recent form, whereas Bennani secures 46.83%. This could influence the match outcome significantly.
• In return games, who's performing better? Contri wins 47.35% of their opponent's second serve points, edging out Bennani who wins 45.18%. Yet, Bennani excels in first serve returns with 36.27%, surpassing Contri's 33.4%.
• When under pressure, which player holds up better? Bennani saves 57.84% of breakpoints, compared to Contri's 51.43%.
• Examining overall performances, Contri won 61.54% of their matches in the last year, while Bennani triumphed in 69.23%.
• Analyzing surface preferences, Contri is strongest on Clay with a 55% win rate, whereas Bennani excels on Hard courts with 67%.
• Both players mostly tackle Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events. Contri claims 62.34%, while Bennani leads with 69.23% wins.
• Opponent quality suggests a slight difference, with Contri facing rankings of 427.38 on average and Bennani, 416.96.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Bennani has a better record, winning 50% of such matches compared to Contri's 43%.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Bennani has a slight advantage by converting 41.9% versus Contri’s 41.71%.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

An analysis of recent performance reveals that Bennani outperforms Contri in second serve success and pressure handling, reflecting greater efficiency and resilience during critical moments.

Contri, however, has an edge in returning opponent's second serves and demonstrates proficiency on clay surfaces. Despite this, Bennani's overall winning percentage is superior over the last year, showcasing robust consistency.

The potential for Contri to leverage their return game exists, but Bennani's steadfast ability to manage breakpoints could prove decisive.

While both competitors have shown capable play at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, Bennani’s slight edge in surface versatility and pressure management positions them as the likely victor in this encounter.